 |
conworlds.info A Community of Worldbuilders
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bloodb4roses Archmage


Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 1578 Location: Off on the side
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:01 am Post subject: Conworlds without metal |
|
|
Or at least where it's a rarity. Kade's conworld, Mtali (which I keep wanting to type "Malti"), got me thinking about worlds that realistically wouldn't have metal working or where metal itself would be a rarity. Like some of the first rocky worlds in this universe (or a very close alternate universe as far as laws go), or a universe with very different physics that disallow metal-analogues, since we really can't say that a "metal" in a universe with very different laws is really "metal" like we think of.
I had wanted to do an early-rock-planet conworld but it's been at the back of my mind. Plus I have two worlds for novels and one world just as a personal sandbox already.
But does anyone else have thoughts on metallurgy or metal lacking worlds? _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyonides Conjurer

Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 242 Location: Kayrise (Necropolis)
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe gravity would prevent them from working metal due to its excesive weight or mercury is the only available metal and kills anyone who doesn't know how to securely handle it. _________________ Noe then nivo adgene Kizne.
The Internet might be either your best friend or your worst enemy. It just depends on whether or not she has a bad hair day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkworldsawake Newcomer

Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Posts: 36 Location: Peering out from the cold, dark reaches between the stars...
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Here's an idea:
Every substance has an animating spirit--however, said spirits exist outside of time and causality. The spirits of metals, seeing the violence that they have the potential to cause, make metal difficult and/or dangerous to work with.
@kyoniides wouldn't such gravity also prevent them from working stone?
Also, @bloodb4roses, isn't that a little greedy? After all, there are only so many hypothetical universes out there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bloodb4roses Archmage


Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 1578 Location: Off on the side
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| darkworldsawake wrote: |
Also, @bloodb4roses, isn't that a little greedy? After all, there are only so many hypothetical universes out there. |
Actually, there's an infinite or near infinite number of universes with laws like or exactly the same as our, with variations of what each of the constants are. This isn't taking into account starting conditions, or universes that have very different laws from ours, different number of spacial or time dimensions, etc.
Edit: Well I guess a great number of them would be near identical, and many of those remaining would be dark, lifeless or follow completely different causation than ours. But infinite minus almost infinite is still infinite. _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kade Newcomer
Joined: 12 Jul 2010 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, someones been intrigued by my ideas.
Well, in short, a world without metals would require at least different humans, metal being an essential part of our diets.
Actually, a world without metals would have different animals and plants, and it would have different minerals as well.
Even a world lacking metallurgy is an unusual attempt that needs a lot of explaining. Some of you may be aware that the American natives (of both North and South America) did not possess much metalcrafting technologies. This was their main setback towards the European settlers and conquistadors, aside from the lack of explosives and horses.
This explanation may work out for one culture, but for a whole planet seems inconclusive. Instead of grabbing for magic, I applied mostly biological and religious explanations, although I prefer the latter.
If you have a population that doesn't fare well with hights, they might not be able to build in mines on mountain tops. However they might dig horizontally into the rock if the idea occurs to anyone.
Religious taboos however can have a deep effect on cultures. In fact far greater than in modern Western culture (unless of course you start analyzing how ideologies and paradigmes are treated as (additional) religions). Traditional laws may prevent anybody from even considering the idea of mining ore. Or removing metal from the sorrounding sorrounding crag. And anyone who does have such a foolish idea will be hunted down and killed. Why would such a radical gain any supporters at all, chopping at the limbs of the earth-mother goddess? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkworldsawake Newcomer

Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Posts: 36 Location: Peering out from the cold, dark reaches between the stars...
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bloodb4roses wrote: |
Actually, there's an infinite or near infinite number of universes with laws like or exactly the same as our, with variations of what each of the constants are. This isn't taking into account starting conditions, or universes that have very different laws from ours, different number of spacial or time dimensions, etc. |
'Twas meant to be a little tongue in cheek. Do you suppose any conworlder could actually harbor that view without being either terribly unimaginative or terribly arrogant?
(If not, I surely hope I haven't come across as either during the few days I've been here.)
At any rate, I still don't think I'm wholly sold on a society without metals having analogous tech to the stuff that exists in our world. I'm of the opinion that if you start with a little difference, over time the effects of that difference will spread to cover more area, so starting with as great a difference as having or not having metal would, I think, inevitably result in a truly alien world.
That's one of the reasons I'm skeptical about such a society having, say, airships, or cannons. Inventions are largely determined by the potential for various applications that materials have. By analogy, it would be somewhat silly to say, "Here's a planet where everyone breathes sulfur aerosols, but the beings look like ordinary humans, trees, whatever". You can't always make the assumption that convergent evolution (technological, religious, cultural, or biological) will act as a crutch to replace your shoddy suspension-cables of disbelief.
Damn, that was an awkward metaphor, sorry for subjecting you all to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kade Newcomer
Joined: 12 Jul 2010 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I'm of the opinion that if you start with a little difference, over time the effects of that difference will spread to cover more area, so starting with as great a difference as having or not having metal would, I think, inevitably result in a truly alien world. |
Ah, well I would agree in that the results would show over time.
But first, think about a society without smiths for a moment. Alright, they exist on earth too, so that can't be truly alien.
Then of course, humans usually try to expand their options with technology. So if none of those stone age tribes ever found that they could heat up metals in an oven, they might end up like many historical societies on earth (before contact with Europeans or neighboring African societies that had metallurgy, that is).
Now building upon that, I never said there where no metals in my world. Only no use of metallurgy, which does make human life possible as seen in abovementioned societies.
And such societies can develop to a technological standard that can be compared with Ancient Rome, Egypt, or Greece. The cultures of Aztecs, Incan society, as well as the Maya developed quite far. Polynesian cultures where highly developed too -- Polynesia consisting of atolls and therefore lacking metals entirely in greater quantity.
Ancient China, India, Egypt and Greece started experimenting with chemicals, as did other cultures with their "alchemists". The Chinese had gunpowder millenia before 'us'.
The Byzantine Empire knew the flamethrower, a well kept secret.
Development of flying machines of course is a recent development on earth. But flying is a human dream, something people have been striving for throughout the ages (may I remind of the Icarus and Daedalos myth?).
So given the chance, humans are likely to try out flight and possibly would develop the cannon. The question "metallurgy or not" doesn't change human dreams significantly. Probably they won't have myths about golden cities, they won't pay with copper coins, they might not fear monsters with iron teeth and they are unlikely to make any connection between silver and the moon, so their mythical werewolves will have different weakness, and their vampire fiction won't involve anything about silver.
Of course, you could argue that for some reason -- this being a alien world -- these humans would have totally alien myths, not just a variation of our own.
That is true. But mortals will always fear death, and therefore be afraid of times and places they are vulnerable to attacks (for diurnal beings like humans, that would be nighttime). And they certainly will fear a predator that can transform into a human, gaining access to your territory with ease. And they too will be scared by the thought of the dead returning, as death will be an inexplicable experience to any mortal sentient.
This is why humans develop were-myths and vampire stories. Silver is a weapon against these manifest fears because it is colour-connected to the moon...and most cultures have moon spirits or goddesses to explain the moon being there in the first place.
So I've given this a bit of thought, among other things.
| Quote: |
You can't always make the assumption that convergent evolution (technological, religious, cultural, or biological) will act as a crutch to replace your shoddy suspension-cables of disbelief. |
Agreed. But that is a logical standpoint unknown to most fantasy authors. And yet some get through with it. Maybe they won't if people rethink their standards. And I'll do my best to bring about that paradigm shift.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
darkworldsawake Newcomer

Joined: 20 Jul 2010 Posts: 36 Location: Peering out from the cold, dark reaches between the stars...
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sorry, what?
Did I just hear you suggesting that suspension of disbelief was unknown to most fantasy authors?
What?
Fantasy authors have to rely more on a suspension of disbelief than authors working in any other genre. It is the responsibility of a fantasy author to portray a world with different rules in a consistent manner, part of that consistency being that things that are different will stay different and diverge from there.
Perhaps the inhabitants of your world would have flying machines, but they probably wouldn't be lighter-than-air--if you're using hot air, your crafts won't be very useful, they'll all be hot air balloons (no dirigibles) and therefore entirely at the mercy of the winds.
I do think the premise is interesting, but it seems a bit far fetched that they'd come up with artillery and lighter-than-air flight. Wood just doesn't have the right properties for dirigible construction. Also, engines? You can't have combustion engines (wood burns, ceramic expands and contracts with heat, etc.) and you certainly can't have clockwork of any kind--even with wooden gears, how would you make springs? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bloodb4roses Archmage


Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 1578 Location: Off on the side
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, when I have a conworld based on our physics, I don't like making "humans". The one I'm working on now has a lot of water on it (compared to Earth) and the sentient species looks a bit like seals mixed with otters, are not mammalian (but are warm blooded and have fur) and might not be able to see most of the shades of purple. _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kade Newcomer
Joined: 12 Jul 2010 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hello darkworldsawake,
| Quote: | Did I just hear you suggesting that suspension of disbelief was unknown to most fantasy authors?
|
No, I'm afraid that we have a misunderstanding here.
There are quite a few fantasy authors that successfully use suspension of disbelief. However most readers (including me) buy stories that do not fully explain all world elements.
Authors, irregardless if they are bookwriters, or if they are preparing the script for a series or a movie, are only human.
So with Tolkien for example you will find ... really little is explained about magic, so little in fact that I don't see a whole picture to say "Okay, so that's how it works." Characters like Tom Bombadil remain a mystery -- readers like mysteries and therefore suspend disbelief -- and yet, this character get's questioned, like everything in a conworld as popular as Middle Earth.
On the other hand, other authors rowling in money (no pun intended) will give explanations that seem odd -- the wizards just happened to be in a magical war of their own during either of our World Wars...and because there are so few wizards around the world, none of them could be involved to help the muggles or the muggle-slaughter.
In both cases (and most others), the authors give no technical explanation of magic, no coherent total picture. I mean, how do Palantiri work? What properties does the kind of magic have that they where made of?
| Quote: |
Fantasy authors have to rely more on a suspension of disbelief than authors working in any other genre. |
If you count sci-fi and steampunk as fantasy, I agree.
| Quote: | | It is the responsibility of a fantasy author to portray a world with different rules in a consistent manner, part of that consistency being that things that are different will stay different and diverge from there. |
Yes, it is. But no one will ever perfectly succeed at that... and many of the B-fantasy-movie makers and wannabe-authors are really bad at this. You may agree to disagree, also on the stuff I just said about two of my favourite fantasy authors.
| Quote: | | Perhaps the inhabitants of your world would have flying machines, but they probably wouldn't be lighter-than-air--if you're using hot air, your crafts won't be very useful, they'll all be hot air balloons (no dirigibles) and therefore entirely at the mercy of the winds. |
I must apologize. A mistake on behalf of my world and me.
I've changed heabrascen culture quite a bit, and had forgotten about the part with the anti-magic laws. Well, it's hot air balloons then -- unless I put more hydrogen-spewing volcanoes into the country... might turn out interestingly, if I can find the proper explanation. Or I leave dirigibles as a tool for heabrascen Raselmar druids-- who certainly would need them as vehicles for movement into secret hideouts.
Thanks. This might turn out removing some problems with transportation and travel. If you continue your criticism like this, I would be very happy on behalf of my world.
| Quote: | | I do think the premise is interesting, but it seems a bit far fetched that they'd come up with artillery and lighter-than-air flight. Wood just doesn't have the right properties for dirigible construction. Also, engines? You can't have combustion engines (wood burns, ceramic expands and contracts with heat, etc.) and you certainly can't have clockwork of any kind--even with wooden gears, how would you make springs? |
Engines are impossible, yes. Which is why dirigibles would require magic for movement... actually, I'm going to rule out zeppelins at this point. The Raselmar druids would simply move the hot air balloons, instead of building a several-air-chamber model. Why would these druids require big airships? Yes, they are a small organization, probably not meeting every week to go on joyrides through the heavens. The only zeppelins I could imagine would be built by a Heabrascen government that ignored it's own principles for the sake of having airships during times of war. Perhaps this happened historically, and sparked the distrust in the government!
How would I make springs? You mean, how do people on Mtali build springs. They mostly use rubber. But, as you have mentioned gears are wooden so they must have a certain size to actually work...because to build minute gears you would probably need to cut tiny cogs into the wood and I'm too unsure if that is possible with, say, a tool made of bone.
Thanks for the idea. You are kind of touching a domino piece there.
Hello bloodb4roses,
| Quote: |
Actually, when I have a conworld based on our physics, I don't like making "humans". The one I'm working on now has a lot of water on it (compared to Earth) and the sentient species looks a bit like seals mixed with otters, are not mammalian (but are warm blooded and have fur) and might not be able to see most of the shades of purple. |
That is understandable. It would be highly unlikely to have humans evolve exactly the same way, even with convergent evolution.
I have non-humans like that too, but I just like humans. They are not, however, the center of my universes. On Mtali, they are one of a handfull of sentient species. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ramses Apprentice

Joined: 10 Mar 2008 Posts: 63 Location: Here
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As for the idea of hot air powered airships:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_airship
Although, I might imagine a similar effect with multiple hot air balloons tied in rows.
As for a conworld without metal, here are some suggestions for alternate materials.
Significantly limited supply:
Sturdy plants (trees, bamboo)
Bone (possible choice for very early cultures)
Perhaps not significantly limited:
Stone/brick
Ceramic
Glass
Fabric
These are just ones I can think of. There may be more options. _________________ "It was not the sadness of one about to commit suicide but the melancholy of one that has been rejected."
- From a Dream |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kade Newcomer
Joined: 12 Jul 2010 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hello Ramses,
Awesome thing, that thermal airship.
As for the resources, there are many, many more. You listed most of the important ones though.
Thanks a lot. There sure are many helpful people here.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daistallia Newcomer
Joined: 17 Jul 2010 Posts: 17
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder if anyone's familiar with Tékumel? It's not devoid of metal, but large accessable deposits are very rare. The workaround was the the hide of the Chlen beast.
| Quote: | | The Chlen: A “triceratops” with six legs, used for haulage. It can charge reasonably fast for a short distance, but most of the time it lumbers along at a couple of miles an hour. Its hide can be peeled, shaped into armour and weapons, and then hardened by a chemical process to give Chlenshe, a light horny material about as hard as bronze. In the absence of iron, this is what warriors have to make do with. At least it allows lots of fancy armour designs lacquered in snazzy colours. |
http://www.tekumel.com/eoasw4_02.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kyonides Conjurer

Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 242 Location: Kayrise (Necropolis)
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | @kyoniides wouldn't such gravity also prevent them from working stone? |
Maybe they've got stones that aren't that hard or dissolve quite easily... _________________ Noe then nivo adgene Kizne.
The Internet might be either your best friend or your worst enemy. It just depends on whether or not she has a bad hair day. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bloodb4roses Archmage


Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 1578 Location: Off on the side
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kyonides wrote: | | Quote: | | @kyoniides wouldn't such gravity also prevent them from working stone? |
Maybe they've got stones that aren't that hard or dissolve quite easily... |
I think it was meant to point out that that if metal is too heavy, then so would be most types of rocks, or at least rocks that would otherwise be useful. It would matter how easily they could dissolve, and softer rocks would "bend" due to the gravity. _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chiarizio Wizard


Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 799 Location: 1 SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 9:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is the conworld purely fantasy? Maybe, purely sword-and-sorcery fantasy?
If so, you don't really need to explain why there's no metal.
Is the conworld actually in the physical universe, perhaps a planet of a star in the Milky Way or some other galaxy?
Then the planet has to have metals in order to have life; but the people living on the planet's surface may not be able to find rich-enough ores close-enough to the surface to develop metallurgy.
Don't forget nearly all of Earth's iron is in Earth's core. It got sent there by gravity when most of the then-important parts of the Earth were molten.
Unless you're going to somehow have life-forms on a gas-giant like Jupiter (or in its atmosphere or in its ocean), life would have to develop on a rocky, "terrestroid" planet. And it would need most or all of lithium, beryllium, boron, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, fluorine, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, silicon, phosphorus, sulphur, and chlorine. (It could most easily do without the lithium, beryllium, boron, aluminum, and silicon; and maybe also the magnesium.) Lithium, beryllium, sodium, magnesium, and aluminum, are all metals; and boron and silicon are metalloids.
Many organisms require many of the elements of the fourth period, elements 19 (potassium) through 35 (bromine); of these, elements 19 (potassium) through 31 (gallium) are metals. They include iron and copper as well as many things useful as alloyants with copper or iron. Some of them are essential trace elements in all forms of life.
Maybe you could have a situation in which elements heavier than chlorine are rare enough on the surface that they're never found in large amounts in sufficiently pure ores to be useful. They might occur visibly only in precious stones; the rest might be part of the chemical make-up of various life-forms, and impossible to separate out to a usefully pure form. _________________ The mark of a good citizen is that he doesn't believe anything if he can help it.
-- W.B. Yapp
-----------------------------
I am also eldin raigmore.
Last edited by chiarizio on Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bloodb4roses Archmage


Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 1578 Location: Off on the side
|
Posted: Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chiarizio wrote: |
Maybe you could have a situation in which elements heavier than chlorine are rare enough on the surface that they're never found in large amounts in sufficiently pure oars to be useful. They might occur visibly only in precious stones; the rest might be part of the chemical make-up of various life-forms, and impossible to separate out to a usefully pure form. |
For the conworld I was thinking of, the early universe planet, I was thinking of something similar to what you suggest. Basically, the really heavy elements are rare. In fact, iron might be relatively rare. What iron and heavier elements there were would almost exclusively be in the core of the world, even more so than here on Earth. There might not even be much iron in meteors, so any species that evolved on the planet to be sentient would not learn iron working like Earth cultures had, using "star iron".
Then again, the planet would have to be assumed to be orbiting one of the first "dwarf" stars in the universe. _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chiarizio Wizard


Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 799 Location: 1 SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would they also need to be hydrogen-breathers or something?
Transport of oxygen from the environment (whether water or air) to the cells requires chemicals that contain heavier elements. Most of the transition metals in the fourth period (elements 21 through 30, Scandium through Zinc), are involved in either photosynthesis or in oxygen-transport in at least one species *here* on Earth.
Without vanadium or iron or copper to transport oxygen, or chromium or manganese for photosynthesis, or potassium or calcium for nerves and bones, I don't know that any complex animal life could evolve.
Also, selenocystine is an essential amino-acid for mitochondria; without mitochondria, how are your creatures going to get the energy to do anything useful? And selenocystine needs selenium, which is also in the fourth period (but its a metalloid in the oxygen-sulfur group in the p-block, instead of being a transition metal).
Can they breathe nitrogen or fluorine or sulfur or chlorine, instead of oxygen or hydrogen? _________________ The mark of a good citizen is that he doesn't believe anything if he can help it.
-- W.B. Yapp
-----------------------------
I am also eldin raigmore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
su_liam Newcomer
Joined: 19 Jul 2010 Posts: 19
|
Posted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One plausible possibility is carbonosis, as detailed on pp 52-53 of World-Building and, "Carbonosis: Organic Dessication and the Fermi Paradox," both by Stephen Gillett. Basically a solar system whose source of heavier elements was a planetary nebula rather than a supernova will tend to be richer in carbon and nitrogen than oxygen. Thus all of the oxygen gets bound up with carbon rather than some being available to bind with iron. With that, almost all of the iron dives to the core with the other siderophiles.
Once life gets going, oxygen can still be freed by photosynthesis, and traces of iron will remain on the surface. That iron will be insufficient to drive a real, "Iron Age," but may be enough for hemoglobin and the like. This would make it much like nickel on our planet, or for that matter even copper and tin. Perhaps occasional places with anomalous concentrations of iron ores will be sought after strategic prizes.
The Rust Monster might be a plausible critter on a world like this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chiarizio Wizard


Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 799 Location: 1 SouthEast Michigan
|
Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Neat!
Thanks, @su-liam! _________________ The mark of a good citizen is that he doesn't believe anything if he can help it.
-- W.B. Yapp
-----------------------------
I am also eldin raigmore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|